<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Karousel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karouselmag.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karouselmag.com</link>
	<description>Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fair Fares on the MBTA? by Jen</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2012/02/fair-fares-on-the-mbta/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=1605#comment-906</guid>
		<description>So happy that I can commute by bike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So happy that I can commute by bike!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Friendship by Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2012/01/to-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=1560#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Umm....why haven&#039;t I seen you wear any of these? Stop denying the world their beauty. Cute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;.why haven&#8217;t I seen you wear any of these? Stop denying the world their beauty. Cute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Friendship by Mu Mu Oddwala</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2012/01/to-friendship/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Mu Mu Oddwala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=1560#comment-824</guid>
		<description>I LOVE SUSY JONES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE SUSY JONES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMC&#8217;s &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is Glamorizing Cigarette Smoking by Sienna</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/05/mad-men-is-glamorizing-cigarette-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Sienna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=465#comment-296</guid>
		<description>So you are implying that we are all idiots who do everything through televised influence - monkey see monkey do style. What ever happened to self control and will power I wonder... I love the show, but I never took up drinking or smoking during or after an episode because it looks cool to do so in the show. (not a smoker or a drinker to begin with.) Nor did I start dressing like it&#039;s the 60&#039;s just because it &quot;looks cool&quot;.
Do you pick up a mop and start mopping your kitchen uncontrollably every time you see a Swiffer commercial?  The entire television/entertainment industry is one big ad campaign for corporations that want to sell merchandise. It&#039;s not a conspiracy. It&#039;s reality. Do you feel like taking it down to the streets and start shooting people every time you see a film that glamorizes gangsters and street thugs? Do you feel like buying the entire Chanel store after you watch a runway show? Do you do what others tell you all the time? If you do, you might want to consult a psychiatrist for your condition. 
Cigarettes are not popular because of this one television show or any other show for that matter. The government allows tobacco companies to manufacture the cancer sticks because tobacco companies are one of the top 3 biggest lobbyists/financial political contributors in Washington DC (along with pharma and defense contractors). People smoke because governments across the globe allow tobacco companies to produce the deathly merchandise. 
Entertainment does not need to set positive examples, nor do celebrities. If you are unable to decide for yourself matters that concern your life/health/choices, maybe you shouldn&#039;t watch television, or read newspapers or talk to other people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are implying that we are all idiots who do everything through televised influence &#8211; monkey see monkey do style. What ever happened to self control and will power I wonder&#8230; I love the show, but I never took up drinking or smoking during or after an episode because it looks cool to do so in the show. (not a smoker or a drinker to begin with.) Nor did I start dressing like it&#8217;s the 60&#8242;s just because it &#8220;looks cool&#8221;.<br />
Do you pick up a mop and start mopping your kitchen uncontrollably every time you see a Swiffer commercial?  The entire television/entertainment industry is one big ad campaign for corporations that want to sell merchandise. It&#8217;s not a conspiracy. It&#8217;s reality. Do you feel like taking it down to the streets and start shooting people every time you see a film that glamorizes gangsters and street thugs? Do you feel like buying the entire Chanel store after you watch a runway show? Do you do what others tell you all the time? If you do, you might want to consult a psychiatrist for your condition.<br />
Cigarettes are not popular because of this one television show or any other show for that matter. The government allows tobacco companies to manufacture the cancer sticks because tobacco companies are one of the top 3 biggest lobbyists/financial political contributors in Washington DC (along with pharma and defense contractors). People smoke because governments across the globe allow tobacco companies to produce the deathly merchandise.<br />
Entertainment does not need to set positive examples, nor do celebrities. If you are unable to decide for yourself matters that concern your life/health/choices, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t watch television, or read newspapers or talk to other people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on reCAPTCHA Exploits the Masses by Dion</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/10/recaptcha-exploits-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 10:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=850#comment-251</guid>
		<description>1. I am sure that the admins would prefer to spend their time checking your response to articles to make sure that you are human. You of course would expect this for free or would you be willing to pay for it?

2. I am sure that you would be happy to spend hours sift through websites riddled with SPAM rather than spend a few seconds using your brain.

3. Please make sure that the programmer who made the open source CAPTCHA code at the bottom of the article available to you in this blog is compensated. No? Then using your logic, you are exploiting the programmer. 

4. Please make sure you pay for all the bandwidth you use on every part of the web that you travel. No? Then you are exploiting those that provide it. You most certainly did not ask them.

5. You have my email with this submission. Please make sure I get paid for this submission. You don&#039;t want to exploit me and my time. While you are at it, please pay me for my time to read this misguided drivel. 

6. The sites that use reCaptcha do it by choice. They can continue to use Captcha or they could actually write their own. Instead they chose  to &quot;exploit&quot; a piece of code written by someone else to do this work for them.

7. The sidewalk that you walk on using your logic came from other peoples tax dollars - not yours. Many were probably laid before you were born... get over it dude... seriously...
5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I am sure that the admins would prefer to spend their time checking your response to articles to make sure that you are human. You of course would expect this for free or would you be willing to pay for it?</p>
<p>2. I am sure that you would be happy to spend hours sift through websites riddled with SPAM rather than spend a few seconds using your brain.</p>
<p>3. Please make sure that the programmer who made the open source CAPTCHA code at the bottom of the article available to you in this blog is compensated. No? Then using your logic, you are exploiting the programmer. </p>
<p>4. Please make sure you pay for all the bandwidth you use on every part of the web that you travel. No? Then you are exploiting those that provide it. You most certainly did not ask them.</p>
<p>5. You have my email with this submission. Please make sure I get paid for this submission. You don&#8217;t want to exploit me and my time. While you are at it, please pay me for my time to read this misguided drivel. </p>
<p>6. The sites that use reCaptcha do it by choice. They can continue to use Captcha or they could actually write their own. Instead they chose  to &#8220;exploit&#8221; a piece of code written by someone else to do this work for them.</p>
<p>7. The sidewalk that you walk on using your logic came from other peoples tax dollars &#8211; not yours. Many were probably laid before you were born&#8230; get over it dude&#8230; seriously&#8230;<br />
5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mount Vernon: well guarded by the citizens of Somerville by Adele McKeon</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2011/03/mount-vernon/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Adele McKeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=1274#comment-247</guid>
		<description>Hmm...&quot;some loud mouth in the crowd yells, “you’re not from Somerville” with a thick local accent.  This reminds me of a &#039;villian I know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;&#8221;some loud mouth in the crowd yells, “you’re not from Somerville” with a thick local accent.  This reminds me of a &#8216;villian I know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMC&#8217;s &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is Glamorizing Cigarette Smoking by Claire</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/05/mad-men-is-glamorizing-cigarette-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 18:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=465#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of Mad Men and have a different perspective on the smoking issue by virtue of living outside the US, in France where smoking is much more widespread at all age levels. I get the impression that the main audience for MM is an adult one whereas it&#039;s in the teen years that most people start smoking. We sent our sixteen year old daughter to live with my brother in the US and go to high school for reasons not related to smoking, but one good side effect of her being here is that she has been able to quit because hardly any teens here smoke cigarettes. (Alcohol and pot is another matter.) It was not TV characters who got her started on cigarettes in the first place. All her friends in France smoke, and when she wanted to quit she found it impossible. I can&#039;t imagine that more than a minuscule minority of adults who have never smoked would take it up as a result of watching Mad Men. I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s right to &quot;blame&quot; Mad Men for any former smokers who have succumbed anymore than MM can be held responsible for any recovering alcoholics who fell off the wagon on account of watching it. 

As for the suggestion they should have used a fictitious cigarette brand, wouldn&#039;t *that* be a glaring anomaly in a show with such a focus on historical accuracy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of Mad Men and have a different perspective on the smoking issue by virtue of living outside the US, in France where smoking is much more widespread at all age levels. I get the impression that the main audience for MM is an adult one whereas it&#8217;s in the teen years that most people start smoking. We sent our sixteen year old daughter to live with my brother in the US and go to high school for reasons not related to smoking, but one good side effect of her being here is that she has been able to quit because hardly any teens here smoke cigarettes. (Alcohol and pot is another matter.) It was not TV characters who got her started on cigarettes in the first place. All her friends in France smoke, and when she wanted to quit she found it impossible. I can&#8217;t imagine that more than a minuscule minority of adults who have never smoked would take it up as a result of watching Mad Men. I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s right to &#8220;blame&#8221; Mad Men for any former smokers who have succumbed anymore than MM can be held responsible for any recovering alcoholics who fell off the wagon on account of watching it. </p>
<p>As for the suggestion they should have used a fictitious cigarette brand, wouldn&#8217;t *that* be a glaring anomaly in a show with such a focus on historical accuracy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMC&#8217;s &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is Glamorizing Cigarette Smoking by Stuart Mathieson</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/05/mad-men-is-glamorizing-cigarette-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Mathieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=465#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I totally agree about &quot;Mad Men&quot;. The same can be said about &quot;Outrageous Fortune&quot; the New Zealand TV &quot;Portia faces life&quot; style serial aimed at women who promote smoking through their social contacts and offspring.

None of this is news. A NZ Company Secretary publication featured the annual report of Rothmans New Zealand in the 1990s. It described the Tobacco&#039;s response to legislating curbing their activities by the policy of &quot;placement&quot; where product features in film and TV drama.

It is fairly obvious period film and TV dramas are a way of promoting/normalising smoking under the guise of artistic verisimilitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree about &#8220;Mad Men&#8221;. The same can be said about &#8220;Outrageous Fortune&#8221; the New Zealand TV &#8220;Portia faces life&#8221; style serial aimed at women who promote smoking through their social contacts and offspring.</p>
<p>None of this is news. A NZ Company Secretary publication featured the annual report of Rothmans New Zealand in the 1990s. It described the Tobacco&#8217;s response to legislating curbing their activities by the policy of &#8220;placement&#8221; where product features in film and TV drama.</p>
<p>It is fairly obvious period film and TV dramas are a way of promoting/normalising smoking under the guise of artistic verisimilitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMC&#8217;s &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is Glamorizing Cigarette Smoking by Alex</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/05/mad-men-is-glamorizing-cigarette-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=465#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with this article and believe that &#039;Lucky Strike (among others)&#039; definitely have a BIG deal with &#039;Mad Men&#039; here... and possibly are behind the entire thing. The writers could easilly have referenced smoking with an invented brand and not one that you can buy in real life. As a reformed nicotine addict I was reluctant to admit that Mad Men is glamourizing smoking, it was actually making me feel ill at the thought of how rough they must feel smoking with such regularity, but after discussions with my girlfriend I conclude that seeing glamourous people smoking will subconsciously glamourise smoking. It is not acceptable that this is aloud to go through the net in todays society. Smoking makes you ugly... in the end and that&#039;s what they should be showing us, not this bullshit to lure people into the addiction and keep lining the pockets of &#039;Big Tobacco&#039;. Fucked up world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with this article and believe that &#8216;Lucky Strike (among others)&#8217; definitely have a BIG deal with &#8216;Mad Men&#8217; here&#8230; and possibly are behind the entire thing. The writers could easilly have referenced smoking with an invented brand and not one that you can buy in real life. As a reformed nicotine addict I was reluctant to admit that Mad Men is glamourizing smoking, it was actually making me feel ill at the thought of how rough they must feel smoking with such regularity, but after discussions with my girlfriend I conclude that seeing glamourous people smoking will subconsciously glamourise smoking. It is not acceptable that this is aloud to go through the net in todays society. Smoking makes you ugly&#8230; in the end and that&#8217;s what they should be showing us, not this bullshit to lure people into the addiction and keep lining the pockets of &#8216;Big Tobacco&#8217;. Fucked up world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on reCAPTCHA Exploits the Masses by Alex</title>
		<link>http://karouselmag.com/2010/10/recaptcha-exploits-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karouselmag.com/?p=850#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I am doing the exactly same thing with stupid reCAPTCHA .. 

Also, I don&#039;t understand, why they apply the &quot;wavy&quot; transformation for both words.. So they not just ask you to work for free, but even make this work intentionally harder than it could be.. This is just simply wrong thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I am doing the exactly same thing with stupid reCAPTCHA .. </p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t understand, why they apply the &#8220;wavy&#8221; transformation for both words.. So they not just ask you to work for free, but even make this work intentionally harder than it could be.. This is just simply wrong thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

